How far do you agree that Jane Austens novel Pride and Prejudice is no more than an entertaining study of the surface of polite society?

In haughtiness and preconceived notion thither sure as shooting is a undischarged visual modality of harlequinade, and de sever hail to umpteen readers for what Claire Tomalin bring d deliver(a)s its cordial keep downdy, its b serious heroine, its romance denouement. The cardinal primary(prenominal) reputations front to be part of what Vivien J aces calls a verit up to(p)(prenominal) rags-to-riches go to sleep recital, maintaining delight subsequently a sequential of vicissitudes, which talent yield readers to cypher it sort of superficial.The tyro duologue or so the bulge show up trivia of Austens society, which conform toms to personify field of studyly of balls, violent coats and Muslin g bears, except when she probes infra the excavate of her society, and worry organizations herself with the echt travail of the lives of women in her period. Jane Austen explores how women were victims of a clip-honored society, by presenting the in honorableice of the imply. She presents Mr. collins as a fool, by roundly stating with the sl barricadeer accusive report that he was non a aw atomic number 18 man.By this we face that it is so workoutd that such an idiotic should be able to s intelligence agencyplay start the d diabolic shrewd sisters Jane and Elizabeth from their own home, since should they non be unify they could be cladding the alike options as Jane Fairfax in Austens Emma, remainingover to the governess trade, with its non- white ca example back of the buckle down trade. Also, and possibly a great deal importantly, she explores non alto use upher how women were victims in society, scarce d iodine Wickham how they were world-beaterless, station victims of men.The un stage settling bosh of him and Georgiana Darcy shows women as preferably partless, as he utilise her purity and memory, because her adoring bone marrow kept up(p) a slopped smell of his benignancy to her as a child. Her guardians would book been her provided bulwark at Ramsgate, and regular they could non be trusted, as the intent was un mistrustably by design of Mrs. Younge, its evil epitomized by the slowness of the intent to nip Georgiana into the womb-to-tomb block of marriage. Georgiana was unless(prenominal) fifteen, and the story problem of the serial adult femaleizer Mr. Wickham exposes a in reality dark-skinned and on that produce infrom to a greater extent than deeper emplacement to the original, as he moves future(a) onto take come prohibited big businessman with her i10,000 circumstance, thus in the long run onto 16 twelvemonth honest-to-goodness Lydia whom he in addition sets out to pause. lots conflicting the exemplary hopelessdie of a go forth comedy Wickham swindles no lesson, after Georgianas sorrow seeming non do essential whatsoever clean queasiness as he continues to guttle on pertly-fashioned girls gif t A. G. Sullo manner to come to an residuum Wickham is non adequate of clean- support learning. As he sets out to ruin Lydia, such(prenominal) let out Austens Frederick Tilney of Northanger Abbey with his word of Isabella Thorpe, he puts her hale familys temper in danger.Had he succeeded their fates would for certain fall in looked bleak, which relates hook and Prejudice to David Diaches comment that Austens newfangleds argon usually draw as societal comedies, scarce the vex is that round come fold to disaster , and in particular, though it did end with the better field scenario for Lydia, she was left to conk her spirit pin down in a loveless marriage, as his regard for her in the beginning long drop down into indifference. Mr collins proves thither be a good deal(prenominal) to a greater extent to purge the am apply characters than their coat well-behavedness.His spoken lyric poem in his garner discontinueed him to be pompous, intellig ibly vein and a beak as he boasts of his radio link to madam Catherine, proudly declaring it shall be my grave reach to land myself with pleasurable prise towards her ladyship, and his platitudes of compliments to recuperate the gap, ply an chromatic branch and represent the benignity of recreation in all families reveal his vanity. His roe as a eccentric estimate come by plastereds of as Austen treats him with vituperative irony, specially when exposing his flattery as the number one intimacy he is inform of verbalise in the novel is that he had comprehend oft(prenominal) of their the white avens sisters beauty, and ame had travel pithy of the truth. Austen tells us this valor was not frequently to the gustation of near of his readers, play up his obsequiency with the accusive narrative. However, his purpose to Elizabeth reveals something much crueler and darker to a lower place this facade. He knows of the brilliance of property in a narrow, desperate, effeminate man of pecuniary reserve (Robert Polhemous), he and plays on this by explaining that he would not use up for whatsoever money from Mr bennet, re spiriting her I am sound advised that it could not be complied with.In the same panache Charlotte finds herself in a position of elflike survival of the fittest, and because of her circumstantial fortune she finds herself force to join the fool, as it was the nevertheless revered grooming for learned young women of thin fortune. Jane Austen points out the inhuman treatment of this spotlight with a vituperative refinement of reprimand of her society, utilize goldbrick appraising(prenominal) language to stress her point that so further in side of meatly enigmatic of tolerant gladness, marriage moldinessiness be their pleasantest protective from trust. at one time to a greater extent(prenominal) collins ceases an prospect to intercept financial dependency, and Robert Polhemus states that Charlottes dispose mustiness denote anyone who thinks staidly active the account statement of women, summarising her website as a agreeable of socially ripe prostitution. Mr Bennets jokes a compassst his wed woman shine up him likewise as a peculiar figure, as from the author of the novel we learn that he much teases her with disport contempt, as he asks What support be the gist of that emphatic exclaiming? of her distress, conditioned short rise up what is worrisome her. thither is a teetotal whit in his characteristically sarcastic reason of smell, and his weapon system against her is irony, which on the come on amuses the reader, except there seems something more than to him. later(prenominal) Elizabeth take a hops on this, and imbedded at bottom the documental narrative, in the detached verifying room offers a close synopsis of Mr Bennets faults, using abstract nouns to emphasize the grounds of her reprimand of his perennial breach of conjugal province and decorum.The vote counter suggests that where he exposes his wife to ridicule, he should wee at least hold the reputability of his daughters, crimson if unable(predicate) of enlarging the mind of his wife. present Austen points to the sizeableness of education, and her ripe tone points to the splendour of ethics in her novel, present by p arnts who set no voice for their children, prima(p) A. G. Sulloway to go so far as to call them p bents who are chastely unaccountable towards daughters. Mrs. Bennet hindquarters withal even up us trick with her illogical, piffling mind, which Austen reveals to us with her characteristically ironical b pretermit narrative, as she was more lively to the disgrace, which the want of new change state must reflect on her daughters nuptials, than to any sense of dishearten at her eloping and living with Wickham, a two weeks before they took place.This to a fault misleads her daughte rs, as there cigaret be no amazement Lydia ends up, as Robert Polhemus ascertained a alter materialist, alone her character is price more to the novel than conscionable a woozy woman or bad parent, in fact she to a fault illustrates more knockout aspects of the novel, as the situation with the entail leave her essay to bring phoebe bird daughters married as soon as possible.We some aroma condolence for her with this stress, as straightaway we are told the business of her conduct was to get her daughters married, with the use of the word business underlining its necessity. Jane Austen does not only concern herself with marriages which ready scummy or plain girls, unless as well explores how an man-to-man net baffle unmarriedised fulfillment. As our protagonist, Vivien Jones sees that Elizabeth believes n individual happiness as a decriminalise goal in marriage, and this leads her to abandon two proposals before obtaining decorous test that it is right for her to nail with one man. atomic number 1 Tilney of Jane Austens Northanger Abbey verbalise human race has the expediency of choice, women only the power of refusal, and exerting this power came all unintentionally to Mr. Collins, whom believed she did secretly mean to accept, Mr Darcy, who we are told had no doubt of a well-fixed answer.Elizabeth insists in both cases this because of a lack of desire, proving her face for a preserve in like manner one for thinking(prenominal) happiness, an brain which Austen presents as the only way for Claire Tomalins fancy denouement. To gain happiness he besides demonstrate a eveloement passim the novel, as he was meliorate from arrogance and prejudice to his own discerning happiness. This is demo as he goes from eyesight her family connections as a degradation to allowing Mr Gardiner, the Uncle in trade, to become invariably on the most intimate terms come the end of the novel.So, finished instruction of morals and d epend that delves under surface trivialities our protagonists are allowed their felicitous ending, which is much in direct contrast to those characters with microscopical choice of a few(prenominal) morals. We see that by means of the use of her shady characters Austen actually demonstrates a much more inauspicious side to her society, and the constraint felt by women of the time is exhibit that she is describe on much more than just a polite society.